Current location:entertainment >>
EDITORIAL: Hong Kong’s security ordinance will strangle city’s society, economy
entertainment8People have gathered around
IntroductionUnder the guise of “national security,” Hong Kong’s legislature recently passed a draconian security ...
Under the guise of “national security,” Hong Kong’s legislature recently passed a draconian security ordinance. The legislation represents a dangerous enhancement of control that could seal off not just citizens’ rights but the once-vibrant city’s free economic activities as well.
The “Safeguarding National Security Ordinance” was cast as a measure to complement the Hong Kong national security law enacted in 2020 that establishes security-related crimes such as secession.
The new ordinance lists a range of national security violations, including insurrection, incitement to mutiny and acts with seditious intention, and defines them as crimes punishable with penalties of up to life imprisonment.
Its aim is clearly for a more comprehensive and powerful crackdown on antigovernment activities. It includes a provision that allows police to stop a suspect from consulting a lawyer when it is deemed necessary to protect national security. This, of course, raises serious human rights concerns.
What is particularly disturbing is the inclusion of provisions for espionage, theft of state secrets and “external interference.” Definitions of “secrets” and “interference” remain vague, posing a risk that foreign companies and foreign nationals may be directly targeted for prosecution. No wonder countries like the United States and Japan have expressed grave concerns.
In introducing the ordinance, Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee emphasized the need to strengthen security legislation in response to “foreign agents and advocates of Hong Kong independence.”
Justifying authoritarianism by citing threats from “outside” follows exactly the same method as the Chinese Communist Party’s usual tactics.
This will likely tarnish Hong Kong’s long-held reputation as the gateway to the Chinese market and an international financial center, diminishing its international stature.
The ordinance was unanimously passed by the Legislative Council on March 19, just about a dozen days after it was introduced on March 8. It is reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s administration rushed the Hong Kong government to enact it quickly.
Hong Kong is supposed to have a separate legal system from mainland China. If Xi’s policy of prioritizing national security over economic development has eroded the integrity of the legal system of the semi-autonomous Chinese city, the new ordinance is tantamount to additional damage to Hong Kong’s uniqueness.
The political motives behind the ordinance’s enactment cannot be overlooked.
Originally, Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law called for legislation prohibiting acts that threaten national security. However, when the Hong Kong government proposed such legislation to the Legislative Council in 2003, massive protests erupted, eventually growing to an outpouring of dissent involving half a million citizens and forcing the Hong Kong authority to withdraw the measure.
By passing the ordinance through the Legislative Council this time, the authorities likely aimed to maintain the appearance of legislation based on “a high degree of autonomy,” as stipulated in the Basic Law.
But what must not be forgotten is that this does not mean public opinion has shifted from opposition to support.
The unanimous passage of the ordinance only reflects the harsh crackdown on the pro-democracy movement and antigovernment activities since the enactment of the national security law four years ago. Under the law, citizens were detained merely for voicing protests, critical media were crushed, and the democratic faction was ousted from the Legislative Council through electoral system changes, leaving it uniformly “pro-Beijing.”
Article 27 of the Hong Kong Basic Law explicitly guarantees Hong Kong residents the freedoms of speech, association, and assembly. Has the Hong Kong government forgotten this crucial article?
If it cannot protect citizens’ rights, Hong Kong’s system can no longer be described as autonomous.
--The Asahi Shimbun, March 22
Tags:
Reprint:Friends are welcome to share on the Internet, but please indicate the source of the article when reprinting it.“Culture Circuit news portal”。http://svalbard.whetstonetavern.com/article-05d199944.html
Related articles
New Jersey seeks fourth round of offshore wind farm proposals as foes push back
entertainmentLONG BEACH TOWNSHIP, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey is seeking a new round of proposals to build wind energy ...
Read moreALISON BOSHOFF: Yo ho ho! Johnny Depp to launch his own brand of Caribbean dark rum
entertainmentHe's famous for loving booze — and now actor Johnny Depp is to launch his own brand of Caribbean rum ...
Read moreI got married at the top of a 2,600
entertainmentA skiing-obsessed bride took her entire wedding party to the top of a 2,600-metre snowy mountain to ...
Read more
Popular articles
- Free child care from higher taxes? These cities subsidize daycare
- 'He's almost like a LEAGUE TWO player': Roy Keane slams Erling Haaland for his display in City's 0
- Serial mistress, 54, enjoys luxurious £5,000 trip to Costa Rica
- I was deepfaked in porn videos having sex with various men
- Cupid's stunt snares fugitive, 27, and his mother, 51, in Cape Town following six
- Dame Kiri Te Kanawa honoured for her achievements in Parliament
Latest articles
Kazakhstan arrests ex
Masterful meals: Masterchef 2014 Champion Ping Coombes's nasi goreng with sambal belacan
Ashley Roberts puts on a leggy display in a tiny mini
First look: Prince Andrew 'car crash' interview with Emily Maitlis film trailer released by Netflix
Mom shopping in Target stunned by small print on Clorox wipes
Labour concedes it could have done more to deal with disruptive state housing tenants
LINKS
- Lisowski upsets Ding in Crucible thriller
- Lionel Messi gets 2 goals in front of record New England crowd as Miami beats Revolution 4
- Meet the little
- Teixeira scores late as Shanghai derby ends all square
- Troops set for 'on
- Conservative MP Dan Poulter defects to Labour in the latest blow to Rishi Sunak
- Wang Shun qualifies for Paris Olympics
- DR ELLIE CANNON: Why do I get pain in my armpit during a strenuous bike ride?
- Xavi to stay as Barca coach in dramatic U
- Conservative MP Dan Poulter defects to Labour in the latest blow to Rishi Sunak